
By
Glenn Plymate
Supervisor of Airports,
|
This story about the evolution of the Wakonda Beach airport begins in 1948 when a rough airstrip was graded out about three blocks east of a section of the Oregon coast known as Wakonda Beach. It was a small strip, about 160-170 feet wide and 1,700 long, surrounded by trees, and with poor approaches on both ends. It was parallel to the coastline, just south of Wakonda Beach Road and about 900 feet east of Highway 101. The strip was on three parcels of property owned by Jesse and Edyth Plankington and another parcel owned by Henry McMillan. In October 1948, Plankington advised the State Board of Aeronautics that grading had been done and asked for advice on what grass seed to use. In 1949, Plankington contacted Aeronautics and asked for help in getting timber down on property south of his strip. He also discussed leasing the strip to Aeronautics for $1 per year and having the State develop it as a "safe landing field." He was advised that public funds could not be used on private property and that more property was needed to the south for a longer strip. On June 13, 1951, an offer from Plankington to donate the airstrip was received favorably by the Board of Aeronautics. It took nearly a year for acceptable deeds to be prepared, but titles to the four parcels were transferred to the State Board of Aeronautics on May 20, 1952. The airstrip, which encompassed about 8.7 acres, was given to the State with the mutual understanding that it would be made more usable for aircraft. Aeronautics endeavored to make the airstrip more useable, but little was done in the next four years to make it safer. During that time Plankington arranged for the purchase of an additional 1.4 acres adjoining the south end of the airstrip to make it longer. This would add 300 feet of length. It was purchased in 1956 for $3,000 by the State Board of Aeronautics. Avigation easements were also acquired from two adjacent land owners for approach protection. This now made the property for the airstrip 2,000 feet long but there was still a problem with the dfficiult south approach and trees and wires on the north end of the strip, as noted in a letter dated April 4, 1958. The Plankingtons also owned property around the airstrip and had divided it into lots they hoped to sell to pilots who would build vacation homes nearby. To stimulate interest, the Plankingtons sponsored annual fly-ins in the late 1950's but they were not well attended. So, as a further inducement, they held a fly-in on July 10, 1960 and offered one of the lots as a door prize. There was a competing fly-in at the coast at a more popular airport (Nehalem Bay) and it drew a majority of the pilots that day. Only 10 airplanes showed up for the Wakonda Beach fly-in, but Plankingtons honored their promise of a give-away lot to the lucky pilot -- providing the winner built a coastal home on it. The size of the lot was 50 by 100 feet and it was valued at $500. Although there was no view of the ocean, it was adjacent to the airstrip, perfect for a fly-in cabin. |

|
Negotiations
with seven property owners took several years
with two deeds being acquired in 1962, two in 1963, one in 1965, and
one in
1966. Although compensation for the
seventh parcel had been agreed to in 1963-64, title was not transferred
until All the additional property was free and clear, and there were no reversionary clauses to require aviation use as those in the deeds for the original donated property. Final cost of the additional land totaled $28,500.
|

|
Because of
turnover in personnel and the changes in
administrations since the beginning, it would have been difficult to
keep such
an improvement project on the front burner. When
the project began, State aviation was administered by
an autonomous
Board of Aeronautics -- a five person board dedicated to the promotion
of
aviation in In 1985, a
permanent NOTAM was issued stating landings to
the south and takeoffs to the north are not recommended.
Maintenance was lacking. Mowing
of the strip which was first done by Aeronautics
personnel and later by the Highway Department, was arranged with a
local
airport user but, unfortunately, it had to be terminated in 1998
because of
prohibitive insurance requirements. In
1999, a tractor was traded to the Clearing of the additional acreage on the west side of the strip was done by a logging contractor in the winter of 1989, but there has been no clearing since. It was the wettest part of the year and heavy equipment left deep ruts along the sides of the runway, which are still there. Drainage ditches have not been maintained and there are several weeks during the rainy winters when the airstrip is literally unusable. As the aerial photo shows, there is considerable erosion along the sides of the airstrip. In the last several years a number of ideas for development have been proposed but nothing has become of them. In 1992, there was a proposal to develop a 30-space RV park on 2.74 acres between the highway and the airport, but it went nowhere. In 1994, a hangar was proposed by a nearby neighbor but nothing ever came of it. And, in 1995, a development group proposed building a café, flight office and hangar, and a picnic area near the northwest end of the airport. When they learned of the potential for a realigned, longer airstrip they modified their proposal to move it to the south end with a taxiway cleared out along the centerline of the future realigned runway. This was a good plan and would have protected the potential for future development of a better airport. But the proponents did not keep in touch and they were not heard from after 1997. In the mid-1990's, correspondence files show that others expressed an interest in building hangars too, but nothing ever materialized. An internal
memo
in 1996 gave advice to "use the
current runway in planning development" -- an almost sure sign the
proposal for a better airport had long been forgotten or had become
very low on
the State's priority list. This would
not have protected the potential for a better airport. There is yet
more
evidence that the prospect of a better
airport was sinking into the abyss when, in 2004, an Airport Layout
Drawing was
prepared by a Louisiana firm under contract to ODA that, for whatever
reason, omitted
about half the property that had been purchased for the widening and
lengthening of the airport. The traffic
count
is low, less than three operations per day
on average, and the count is restricted to small, light single engine
aircraft
only. Probably another reason so little
attention is given to the airport. Nevertheless,
a
substantial renovation is needed. Drainage
is a major item. The eroded areas need to
be filled and the
entire strip needs to be smoothed and re-seeded just to protect what's
there. The ODA has
indicated a desire to sell or lease the airport
and asked for proposals from interested parties in February 2006. A major inhibitor is the condition of the
airport, the extent of improvements needed, and the substandard,
hazardous
geometry the airport presents, even if it were in the best of condition. But, it's
not too
late to turn What can be
done
is carry out the original plan for an
improved airstrip, longer, wider, and oriented away from the hill south
of the
airport, as shown below. Clearing,
cutting
and filling, grading, compacting, adding a
crushed rock base, and seeding for a turf runway would cost on the
order of
$200,000. A paved runway, turnarounds,
and parking aprons could be added to make the airport usable year-round. |

|
Money
from aviation was used to
buy the additional property
for developing the airport and no funds from the general public were
used. The State saw the airport as unfit
in 1961
and set out to do something about it. Otherwise,
it would have been closed.
All the groundwork was done but, for whatever reason, it was not followed up. This has remained a substandard airport for the last 40 years. The State owes the public a decent airport and the time to pay up is now. Addendum Exhibits
|